Please read the following article as it is likely to happen if the Bush
regime, or it's nominated successor, continues in office.
As Kurt predicts," the Straussian neocons sincerely intend to populate
the new U.S. prisons" most probably with war dissenters.
They are being constructed by Halliburton,
Bush's favourite contractor.
As Kurt says: " They will be populated with domestic enemies after
some catalysing event such as yet another new Pearl Harbour designed
to light a fire under Iran or other targets on the neocon hit list.
If history serves, chances are the latter will come to pass, and with
a vengeance.."
He ends with "you certainly have a recipe for not only a crisis
of civilisation, but nuclear Armageddon."
My own analysis of the situation is the same.
Because a war with Iran seems to be an important part of the Bush neocon
plan, I think they will do everything necessary to thwart any attempts
for a peaceful resolution of the crisis with Iran. Nevertheless I think
we should do everything possible to work for a peaceful resolution as
Professor Klare suggests.
Please don't think 'it can't happen in New Zealand'. Something like
that could happen in NZ in the right social and political climate. A
new government, and an international crisis believed to have resulted
from enemy action (say a new 9/11 attack on the U.S. blamed on Iran,
to justify a war soon after) would be enough. The media and most New
Zealanders would believe that Iran did it, and that therefore any reaction
is justified, including domestic suppression of liberties and dissent.
Even now, the media suppresses intelligent and knowledgeable discussion
about the Iraq war, and Bush's lies that justified it. So the mass of
population is in ignorance of the facts and what is really going on.
In effect they are being conditioned by the NZ media to accept whatever
'truth' the media presents to them if the worst happens and there is
another 9/11 attack on the U.S. The mass of the NZ population and politicians
of the right, centre and left, are not informed about the present crisis.
Nor are they forewarned about future probabilities based on real knowledge
of the Bush Administration and the present crisis. So they can be expected
to react accordingly to a mad media campaign against Iran, as most people
did, originally, to the litany of lies about 9/11, Iraq involvement,
and the phoney justification for war with Iraq.
"A March 3/06 Zogby Poll showed that 90% of American troops in
Iraq believe that they are fighting to avenge Saddam Hussein's role
in 9/11". Quoted from James H. Fetzer, founder, Scholars for 9/11
Truth. View them at www.st911.org
This shows how easy it is to condition a very large majority of troops
to believe lies and act on them with hatred, torture and killing of
Iraqis. Iraq war lies prevail. Unfortunately it seems that " Lies
endure and the truth is fragile".
What can you do? Plenty. Help publicise the facts on the Iraq war, and
plans for a war on Iran. Forward this and other articles from our web
site: www.nuclearfreenz.org.nz Many other things can be done to help
prevent a disaster.
If
those who value their liberty don't use it, they may lose it.
David Horowitz, on the paycheck
of the reactionary Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation and CIA collaborator
Richard Scaife’s foundation, ranted and raved back at the outset
of the Iraqi invasion in early 2003, issuing shrill warnings about a
“Fifth Column … preparing to move into action to attempt to
defeat America in its war against Saddam.” According to Horowitz,
the incipient “peace movement is not about peace” but is instead
“a fifth column communist movement” determined “to destroy
America and give victory to our totalitarian enemies.” Horowitz
predicted a violent communist revolution in the streets of America—possibly
a flashback to earlier times when Horowitz was an antiwar radical responsible
for orchestrating an often violent “peace” movement with his
high profile Ramparts Magazine (until he decided working for the Straussian
neocons was more profitable)—a hateful bedlam that did not occur
because the 2003 antiwar movement primarily consisted of average Americans,
not “communists” or “America-haters,” as Horowitz
would have it in his paranoid fantasies.
Please read the following article as it is likely to happen if the Bush regime, or it's nominated successor, continues in office.
As Kurt predicts," the Straussian neocons sincerely intend to populate the new U.S. prisons" most probably with war dissenters.
They are being constructed by Halliburton, Bush's favourite contractor.
As Kurt says: " They will be populated with domestic enemies after some catalysing event such as yet another new Pearl Harbour designed to light a fire under Iran or other targets on the neocon hit list. If history serves, chances are the latter will come to pass, and with a vengeance.."
He ends with "you certainly have a recipe for not only a crisis of civilisation, but nuclear Armageddon."
My own analysis of the situation is the same.
Because a war with Iran seems to be an important part of the Bush neocon plan, I think they will do everything necessary to thwart any attempts for a peaceful resolution of the crisis with Iran. Nevertheless I think we should do everything possible to work for a peaceful resolution as Professor Klare suggests.
Please don't think 'it can't happen in New Zealand'. Something like that could happen in NZ in the right social and political climate. A new government, and an international crisis believed to have resulted from enemy action (say a new 9/11 attack on the U.S. blamed on Iran, to justify a war soon after) would be enough. The media and most New Zealanders would believe that Iran did it, and that therefore any reaction is justified, including domestic suppression of liberties and dissent.
Even now, the media suppresses intelligent and knowledgeable discussion about the Iraq war, and Bush's lies that justified it. So the mass of population is in ignorance of the facts and what is really going on. In effect they are being conditioned by the NZ media to accept whatever 'truth' the media presents to them if the worst happens and there is another 9/11 attack on the U.S. The mass of the NZ population and politicians of the right, centre and left, are not informed about the present crisis. Nor are they forewarned about future probabilities based on real knowledge of the Bush Administration and the present crisis. So they can be expected to react accordingly to a mad media campaign against Iran, as most people did, originally, to the litany of lies about 9/11, Iraq involvement, and the phoney justification for war with Iraq.
"A March 3/06 Zogby Poll showed that 90% of American troops in Iraq believe that they are fighting to avenge Saddam Hussein's role in 9/11". Quoted from James H. Fetzer, founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth. View them at www.st911.org
This shows how easy it is to condition a very large majority of troops to believe lies and act on them with hatred, torture and killing of Iraqis. Iraq war lies prevail. Unfortunately it seems that " Lies endure and the truth is fragile".
What can you do? Plenty. Help publicise the facts on the Iraq war, and plans for a war on Iran. Forward this and other articles from our web site: www.nuclearfreenz.org.nz Many other things can be done to help prevent a disaster.
If those who value their liberty don't use it, they may lose it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bush Neocons: Going After Fifth Columnists
by Kurt Nimmo, February 22 2006
David Horowitz, on the paycheck of the reactionary Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation and CIA collaborator Richard Scaife’s foundation, ranted and raved back at the outset of the Iraqi invasion in early 2003, issuing shrill warnings about a “Fifth Column … preparing to move into action to attempt to defeat America in its war against Saddam.” According to Horowitz, the incipient “peace movement is not about peace” but is instead “a fifth column communist movement” determined “to destroy America and give victory to our totalitarian enemies.” Horowitz predicted a violent communist revolution in the streets of America—possibly a flashback to earlier times when Horowitz was an antiwar radical responsible for orchestrating an often violent “peace” movement with his high profile Ramparts Magazine (until he decided working for the Straussian neocons was more profitable)—a hateful bedlam that did not occur because the 2003 antiwar movement primarily consisted of average Americans, not “communists” or “America-haters,” as Horowitz would have it in his paranoid fantasies.
continue.....